AVL trees are actually easier to implement than RB trees because there are fewer cases. And AVL trees require O(1) rotations on an insertion, whereas red-black trees require O(lg n). In practice, the speed of AVL trees versus red-black trees will depend on the data that you re inserting. If your data is well distributed, so that an unbalanced binary tree would generally be acceptable (i.e. roughly in random order), but you want to handle bad cases anyway, then red-black trees will be faster because they do less unnecessary rebalancing of already acceptable data.On the other hand, if a pathological insertion order (e.g. increasing order of key) is common, then AVL trees will be faster, because the stricter balancing rule will reduce the tree s height. Splay trees might be even faster than either RB or AVL trees,depending on your data access distribution. And if you can use a hash instead of a tree, then that ll be fastest of all.

rbtree
......\rbtree.cpp
......\rbtree.ncb
......\rbtree.sln
......\rbtree.vcproj

• We are an exchange download platform that only provides communication channels. The downloaded content comes from the internet. Except for download issues, please Google on your own.
• The downloaded content is provided for members to upload. If it unintentionally infringes on your copyright, please contact us.
• Please use Winrar for decompression tools
• If download fail, Try it againg or Feedback to us.
• If downloaded content did not match the introduction, Feedback to us，Confirm and will be refund.
• Before downloading, you can inquire through the uploaded person information

Nothing．